That isn’t going to make this change much easier to swallow, though.Facebook MOD APK 413.0.0.30.104, Pro, Unlimited Features Unless forced, users might have stuck with the old Facebook app’s messaging interface instead of seeing there was something that could better compete with these other apps. While it bought WhatsApp for $19 billion, it still has to battle lean standalone messaging apps like WeChat, Kik, KakaoTalk, and Line. Facebook is fighting a war overseas for the fate of messaging. The only real explanation for moving this quickly is that desperate times call for desperate measures. Taking a slower “We’re switching everyone eventually, so you might as well do it now” approach might have gone over better than “Your familiar chat interface will be destroyed in two weeks whether you like it or not”. Still, a unilateral forced migration is the exact kind of change Facebook users hate, and this will only breed more paranoia that their social network could change without their consent. Here’s our hands-on video for Messenger and an interview with its designers: And once users go through the chore of setting up Messenger and adapting to its style, they may enjoy it better. Personally, I like Messenger’s clean look and feel, playful sounds, and quick performance. It promotes faster feature development and better stability. Obviously there’s merit to only having to maintain one mobile chat interface. A portion of Facebook users may prefer to keep things simple with one app for everything Facebook, even if it means it’s slower and it takes more taps to get to their messages.įacebook was criticized for its bloated main apps but this announcement seems like an over-correction, swinging wildly in the direction of each function having its own app. Not everyone wants to manage multiple Facebook apps on their homescreen or stick them in a folder. Its numbers probably indicate that people message more and have a better experience on the standalone Messenger app.īut forcing users to adopt a new messaging behavior could be very unpopular. And the reason why we’re doing that is we found that having it as a second-class thing inside the Facebook app makes it so there’s more friction to replying to messages, so we would rather have people be using a more focused experience for that.”Įssentially, Facebook sees Messaging within its main apps as slow, buried, and sub-optimal overall. “the other thing that we’re doing with Messenger is making it so once you have the standalone Messenger app, we are actually taking messaging out of the main Facebook app. In an onstage talk I did with Mark Zuckerberg in November, the CEO revealed an explanation for today’s change that Facebook’s PR team just referred me to: The only way to escape the migration is to either have a low-end Android with an OS too old to run Messenger, use Facebook’s mobile web site, or use Facebook’s standalone content reader app Paper. And you can bet some users are going to be angry. Eventually, all Facebook users will get migrated to this new protocol. Notifications about the change are going out to some users in Europe starting today, and they’ll have about two weeks and see multiple alerts before the requirement to download Messenger kicks in. Soon, all iOS and Android users will have a hotlink at the bottom of their Facebook app that will open Messenger.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |